World war iii imminent
In addition, they would be able to sink shipping in such a way as to disrupt global oil supplies. (4) In event of attack, Iran would be likely to launch effective missile strikes on ( the counterfeit-Jewish State in, but not of) Israel, U. (3) China and Russia have supplied Iran with very advanced missiles, to protect their investments in Iran. is adamant about using this as a (flimsy) excuse for an attack. (1) Iran's leaders are adamant about pursuing their right to pursue an agenda of peaceful nuclear power generation. proxy, providing what we might call "plausible deniability". And of course we've known for some time that ( the counterfeit-Jewish State in, but not of) Israel has been supplied with "bunker buster" bombs so that they can initiate the first attack as a U. And huge stockpiles of heavy weapons systems have been accumulating on military bases. military leaves have been cancelled beginning in September. Rumor has it that he found out that the Charlottesville "exercise" was going to "go live" and that he was planning to put a stop to it. Even drill sargeants don't get fired for such a trivial offense. It is undeniably true however, that a 4 Star General in the Charlottesville area was fired in the last few days for "sexual misconduct". I find her stuff "over the top", but you may want to look at it, just to see one view on how deep the rabbit hole may go.
#WORLD WAR III IMMINENT SERIES#
easily found via Google - claims to have access to "Russian intelligence sources", and has been putting out a series of reports of a major coup in progress - a battle between the neocon faction and loyal Americans in the Pentagon and Langley. I've been seeing persistent rumors, becoming gradually more credible, that elements of the military and intelligence services are rebelling against this planned launch of WW III. That's the "exercise" and that's also what's likely to happen - unless this particular part of the plan has been thwarted. A nuclear weapon is to be hijacked off a military ship and then detonated in a populated area. One of these, evidently, is or was to be down in Charlottesville. In this current case, it seems there will be more than one simultaneous false-flag incident, and hence more than one "exercise". There is little reason to believe that this proven successful formula will not be used for the launch of WW III. On 9/11, security exercises were being carried out regarding - surprise, surprise - attacks by hijacked airliners on major American targets! On July 7, in London, exercises were being carried out regarding - surprise, surprise - subway bombings in exactly the same places that were actually bombed! The phenomenon, of exercise turning into false-flag incident, is called "going live". We know - from both 9/11 and t he London bombings - that "security exercises" are a standard cover for false-flag incidents. They seem to be playing with a more-or-less open hand. How obvious can they get? The word "covert" seems to have little significance any more. Meanwhile, Cheney has ordered the military to prepare for a nuclear attack on Iran - to be launched as soon as any domestic "terrorist incident" occurs - regardless of whether a connection to Iran exists. Doesn't that strike anyone as odd? If there really was a fear of hostile attack, wouldn't there be some kind of attempt at defense? If our intelligence is so good that we "know attacks are coming", then why is there no information about where, who, or how? Have any of you noticed these obvious glitches in the Matrix? It is worth noting that no steps are being taken to prevent these "attacks", or to protect the population - instead, the events are simply being "predicted". They should know, since they are the ones who will be carrying out the attacks. Washington spells it out when they say they are "expecting" multiple simultaneous terrorist attacks in the U. There will be no surprise for anyone who has their eyes open. The scenario for World War III is incredibly obvious. We all know the motivation: the PNAC agenda oil as power maintaining control of global finance by London and New York banks. claims to the contrary are exactly like the WMD propaganda preceding the invasion of Iraq: pure lies invented to justify an invasion that has entirely different motivations. The CIA leaked a report that it would take Iran 10 years to develop nuclear weapons, and the UN inspectors, who have unlimited access, have given Iran a clean report. Iran has no program to develop nuclear weapons and everyone knows that. You may want to use Google to track down some of the stories I'm reporting on. The stories have been breaking so rapidly however, that I feel I must post something before all hell breaks loose. I'm on holiday, without my usual computer resources, and so this posting will be lacking the kind of documentation that I normally try to provide.